Re: [Debconf-discuss] Gobby vs. Etherpad?
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:02:22AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Why is Gobby prefered over Etherpad for the BOFs and talks at Debconf?
> Personally I prefer Etherpat (I normally use <URL: http://titanpad.com/ >)
> because it only require a functioning browser, and there is no need to
> ask participants to install extra software. As far as I can see, the
> feature set is compatible, and I fail to notice anything relevant
> where Gobby is doing a lot better. The only slight improvement is the
> directory browsing, but that to medo not seem to be enough reason to
> require extra software to be installed to write text.
>
> Anyone care to explain why they prefer Gobby over Etherpad at Debconf?
Because as far as I see titanpad is a propriatory sw that runs on
someones server. At the same time gobby is installed on debian servers
so we do not rely on a 3rd party.
Regards,
cstamas
--
CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas
Reply to: