Re: Why burnfree is off by default?
Matthias Andree <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Volker Kuhlmann <email@example.com> writes:
> > I am able to distinguish stability with the stubbornness to insist on
> > serving the stone-age first. One could express this also in terms of the
> > least common Unix denominator, as the problem is not so rare. Nobody
> > cares what burning CDs was like 10 years ago, and whether cdrecord came
> > before burnfree. But of course setting defaults to suit a handful of
> > people to match their 10-year old expectations instead of catering for
> > 98% of today's(!!) users is your prerogative.
> This is pointless. You have the switch, you can use the switch, you are
> told how to use it, and after all you aren't writing the code.
Instability is a mess that I avoid in favor of people who write GUIs
There is no need to break interfaces every 6 months as done with Linux......
EMail:firstname.lastname@example.org (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
email@example.com (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily