>>>>> "Jose" == Jose Miguel Parrella <bureado@debian.org> writes: Jose> If DPL Team/Committee worked, and delegations start to feel Jose> more permanent (delegated functions make sense, terms are Jose> long) then why wouldn't a few of those delegates become Debian Jose> Leadership Team members alongside DPL, tech-ctte chair and Jose> Secretary? Why wouldn't the "Debian Spokesperson" role, a Jose> formal one that could get invited by any event organizer like Jose> a DPL would, be a Constitution-regulated one? I would be against this change. The current system gives the DPL a lot of flexibility. Today you're seeing that different candidates would focus on different things and organize the people who helped them differently. Sticking these roles into the constitution removes that flexibility with very little gain. I think flexibility is valuable.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature