Just to formalize what I've already said... I think this should be considered for future -private content even if the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument against it is that people didn't expect to have it's private posts revealed. -- Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content of debian-private mailing list. -- To me, it's a second option that would make possible to avoid creating more un-declassificable material on -private even if the GR Proposal 2 is rejected. daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente