On 11:41 Fri 18 Nov 2005, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Just to formalize what I've already said... > > I think this should be considered for future -private content even if > the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument > against it is that people didn't expect to have it's private posts > revealed. > > -- > > Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process > defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content > of debian-private mailing list. > > -- > > To me, it's a second option that would make possible to avoid creating > more un-declassificable material on -private even if the GR Proposal 2 > is rejected. I second this proposal, as well. -- David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net> | http://www.damog.net/ <damog@debian.org> | GPG: C671257D Ahí vienen esos pinches nacos otra vez.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature