On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:02:55AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-07-14 19:42:22 +0100 Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> wrote: > > >On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:00:42PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >>On 2004-07-14 18:03:28 +0100 Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> wrote: > >>>[...] using our conversation that I mentioned as proof that > >>>ftpmaster > >>>can sometimes be reasonable. > >>Who had? [...] > >Perhaps I misconstrued what was written... since several of the emails > >were from you. > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00025.html > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00041.html > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00042.html > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00058.html > > I have no idea why you took mine as "proof" of anything, other than > that amd64 people knew more than was in the GR. I was asking what the > problem is, more-or-less. Or, to repeat from the second of those URLs: > OK, so the GR is seeking to overrule ftpmasters? Were these emails > sent to them about amd64 cc'd anywhere public? I didn't cc: the messages anywhere no. I will make sure any questions of widespread interest are cc:'d to a list from now on. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature