Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Why then would you want to remove that text? The only reason that I can
> see is so that that support can be dropped by some process other than
> the formation of a consensus by supermajority.
The you skiped over the part about ideology (which I belive the SC
should describe) and pragmatism being different. It's a distinction
I'm not surprised that not everybody see but it is important to me.
--
Peter Makholm | I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to
peter@makholm.net | me, to everyone, and may each of you fry in hell
http://hacking.dk | forever
| -- The Dead Past
Reply to: