Hello,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:16:27AM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote:
> As to why I prefer (2) over the rest... CpSSD is well-defined and
> reasonably well studied when all votes are counted equally. I find the
> idea of scaling votes involving particular options to change it enough
> that its properties become unknown and unpredictable. It may be
> severely broken in ways that CpSSD isn't. I'd rather have the core be
> something we know is good. That means that I have legitimate FUD with
> [3] and [4].
I agree with this. But doesn't the same argument apply
to at least [5]?
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
Attachment:
pgpxjBW2lAnSy.pgp
Description: PGP signature