[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gdm3 issue



On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, PaulNM <debian@paulscrap.com> wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 10:03 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
>> <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:08 +0000, Tom H wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Ubuntu-created grub.cfg cannot be blamed for a GDM problem. If GDM
>>>>> is being launched, grub's job has been done many seconds ago.
>>>>
>>>> This seems to be true here, but you're mistaken, a boot option could
>>>> still cause something when a DE session already is running, e.g.
>>>> "threadsirq", "noatime", sure, "noatime" won't brake something, but
>>>> "threadirqs" at least could slow down GUI performance, assumed it's a
>>>> lowlatency kernel.
>>>
>>> PS: Let alone options such as e.g. "single" ;).
>>
>> The "single" kernel cmdline option would never launch GDM.
>
> I believe that was his point, and the reason for the smiley ;).
> Most would say preventing something from happening is a form of
> affecting it.

Except that "single" doesn't make GDM fail, it doesn't even launch it.
It's not the same thing.


Reply to: