On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 03:51, Oleg wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:12 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> > >My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones
> > > and zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up
> > > for political reasons, since Mozilla is thought of as IE's competitor on
> > > Windows.
> > >
> > >End of troll. Dictated, but not read. YMMV IFF you are a lying SOB :-)
> > >
> > >Oleg
> >
> > running on windows 98 with 512MB on a celleron 400 I can tell you it's
> > faster stabler and better than anything else out there.
> >
> > call me a liar at your peril
>
> Tell you what. When you are in Linux, do this:
>
> mkdir ~/test && cd ~/test
> for f in `seq 1 1000`; do touch ${f}.html; done
>
> Notice that `ls` takes no time at all (At least under Linux w/ ext2)
>
> Then start up your browser (Netscape 4.77 or Mozilla 0.9.9 in my case).
> Type "file:///home/you/test" in location, time!
>
> ----------My results------------------
> Mozilla - 9 seconds & 13 seconds
> Netscape - 3 seconds & 3 seconds
> ----------------------------------------
My system : p3 800, 256MB, ext3, IDE.
Timing: Mozilla 1.0 - 0.5sec.
Netscape - not installed.
--
Peter Whysall
peter.whysall@ntlworld.moc
The TLD in my email address is sdrawkcab.
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 sid -- kernel 2.4.18
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part