Re: uptime
* Rino Mardo (rmardo@yahoo.com) spake thusly:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:45:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > * Craig Dickson (crdic@yahoo.com) spake thusly:
> > > will trillich wrote:
> > >
> > > > $ uptime
> > > > 12:44am up 365 days, 1:31, 2 users, load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01
> > > >
> > > > break out the root beer!
> > >
> > > Congrats! I think I'll show this to a few Windows users.
> >
> > Hmm. We had an NT swerver with about 8 months uptime at work[n - 1].
> > The only reson it got rebooted was because we bought a rack and had
> > to switch the fscker off to put it in there. So it's not the OS, it's
> > how you use it...
> >
> so you mean you've never used your nt server at all hence the
> unbelievable uptime? don't get me wrong here i just can't believe the
> figures
We didn't run luser apps on it, except Access (well, DAO, actually). Other
than that it was serving files 24/7. And it was NT _server_, not WS.
Dima
--
In cyberspace no one can hear you laugh -- Bill Bumgarner in RISKS 21.65
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: uptime
- From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>
- Re: uptime
- From: Martin F Krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
- Re: uptime
- From: dman <dsh8290@rit.edu>
- References:
- uptime
- From: will trillich <will@serensoft.com>
- Re: uptime
- From: Craig Dickson <crdic@yahoo.com>
- Re: uptime
- From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>
- Re: uptime
- From: Rino Mardo <rmardo@yahoo.com>