[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package



Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> a écrit:

> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
>
>>>   bluesky/cyrillic  not useful to me, but probably to someone else; don't
>>>                     seem to be available to X apps [With The Packages
>>>                     Installed In My Sid Chroot]
>>> 
>> apt-cache search cyrillic | grep font
>>
>> should give you more than one hit.
>
> Sure, but these are presumably different fonts. The closest thing to a
> font family name that I can infer from the contents of bluesky/cyrillic
> is wncy. apt-cache search finds nothing matching that and a grep on
> the Contents-i386.gz from sid only shows tetex-extra (of course) and
> tex4ht, which ships two wncyr.htf files.

But those Berry-Scheme names are in many cases just weird abbreviations
of the real names, whereas applications that don't use the Berry Scheme
often use filenames that are closer to the "real names", don't they? So
there might be some font with initials WN and cyrillic appearance, and
we just don't find it?

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Reply to: