Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
On 09.11.04 Victor Porton (porton@ex-code.com) wrote:
> On 09-Nov-2004 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi all,
[Type1-fonts separately]
>
> > That bug is now a year old. Meanwhile there exist the package
> > latex-xft-fonts, which contains
> >
> > cmex10, cmmi10, cmr10, cmsy10, msam10, msbm10, wasy10
> >
> > as True Type fonts. Is that sufficient for your needs or do you
> > need anything else? The package description reads:
>
> > Does installing that package (and perhaps the recomm. packages
> > cure your problem maybe even, when using Mozilla)?
>
> Yes, this package suffice as a replacement of installing
> tetex-extra-fonts.
>
I've opened #280567 against mozilla-browser, to add a suggest
(firefox does that already). I guess we can close these bugs.
Hmm: on the one hand I don't like to throw away the work I've done,
on the other hand it is surplus now.
To all: What do you think? Should we close that bug or are the other
fonts in tetex-extra (which are not covered by latex-xft-fonts) worth
to provide them to the rest of the world?
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: