[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#109289: marked as done (tetex-bin: pdftex doesn't support pdf encryption)



Your message dated Tue, 01 Apr 2003 17:25:53 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20030401.172553.112625478.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line Bug#109289: tetex-bin: pdftex doesn't support pdf encryption
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 04:28:50 +0000
>From gus@debian.org Sun Aug 19 23:28:50 2001
Return-path: <gus@debian.org>
Received: from ppp204.adsl89.pacific.net.au (roach.switchonline.com.au) [202.7.89.204] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15YggD-00026f-00; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:28:50 -0500
Received: by roach.switchonline.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B1BB948003; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:28:09 +1000 (EST)
From: gus@debian.org
Subject: tetex-bin: pdftex doesn't support pdf encryption
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <20010820042809.B1BB948003@roach.switchonline.com.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:28:09 +1000 (EST)
X-BadReturnPath: gus@roach.pasture.com.au rewritten as gus@debian.org
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20001218-5
Severity: wishlist

there are patches available to add encryption support to pdftex.
(similar to the xpdf encryption patches)

in fact upstream (pdftex, not tetex) now includes such support by default.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux roach 2.4.8 #1 Thu Aug 16 12:55:12 EST 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debianutils    1.15           Miscellaneous utilities specific to Debian.
ii  dpkg           1.9.16         Package maintenance system for Debian
ii  ed             0.2-19         The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6          2.2.4-1        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libkpathsea3   1.0.7+20001218 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii  libpng2        1.0.12-2       PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01081 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  libtiff3g      3.5.5-6        Tag Image File Format library
ii  libwww0        5.3.2-6        The W3C-WWW library.
ii  libxaw7        4.1.0-2        X Athena widget set library
ii  perl-base      5.6.1-5        The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister.
ii  tetex-base     1.0.2+20000804 basic teTeX library files
ii  xlibs          4.1.0-2        X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g         1.1.3-15       compression library - runtime
libwww-ssl0	Not installed or no info

--- Ignoring modified conffile /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf (>8k)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 109289-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2003 08:25:59 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Tue Apr 01 02:25:58 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.142] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 190H5h-0002BD-00; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 02:25:58 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
	by nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 190H5f-0001tQ-00; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 17:25:55 +0900
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 17:25:53 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030401.172553.112625478.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: gus@debian.org, 109289-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: hille42@web.de
Subject: Re: Bug#109289: tetex-bin: pdftex doesn't support pdf encryption
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <878yv9cwlo.wl@lambast.inside.urnet.com.au>
References: <20010820042809.B1BB948003@roach.switchonline.com.au>
	<20030320201227.GA7586@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
	<878yv9cwlo.wl@lambast.inside.urnet.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 109289-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

From: Angus Lees <gus@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#109289: tetex-bin: pdftex doesn't support pdf encryption
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:54:59 +1100

> At Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:12:27 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > Encryption is included in the actual pdftex of Debian stable
> 
> Yes, I was surprised to find this bug unclosed.
> 
> > but will be removed in future releases. [...] So, what should we do
> > with that bug?
> 
> I'm fine with closing the bug (for now), as the version in stable does
> indeed support pdf encryption.
> 
> I presume (as a practical matter) that we will have to follow upstream
> sources until encryption patches resurface (I know several people on
> the pdftex mailing list intend to write such patches - time will
> tell).  At such a time we can reopen this bug (or file a fresh
> wishlist bug).

I prefer to close this now and get a fresh bug report
at a time necessary.

Thanks,				2003-4-1(Tue)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.



Reply to: