Re: Anyone working on gcc 2.95.2?
Took me long enough...
Just got this working, I think. Test packages are available at
http://www.them.org/~drow/gcc/ now. Depending on the response I get
from the maintainer, there should be a powerpc friendly version in the
archive in the next few days.
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 03:28:09PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 05:59:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Oops, I've gotten behind again :)
> >
> > I'm generally the one who fixes this. I'll sit down with the toolchain
> > tonight if I'm feeling a little healthier.
>
> Ok, just checking if it was in somebody's queue. :) Hope you feel better.
>
> Anyway, I talked to Franz and he's saying that all of his patches are
> incorporated into 2.95.2 so it sounds like we only need to retain the
> DWARF patch, your patch for weak local branches, and that generic
> library prefix patch.
>
> I supplied some fixes for libnewt-perl to build on powerpc that were
> related to varargs which built on x86 and powerpc, but with the new
> version my fixes need to change. va_copy() is no longer available,
> just __va_copy() yet that doesn't work pre 2.95.2. Argghhh. Looking
> at the history of the varargs problems I feel like 2.95.2 is the light at
> the end of the tunnel...I hope I'm right.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Matt Porter
> mmporter@home.com
> This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: