Re: RFS: ustr
first thing I can recommend: Don't use cdbs for that. That just doesn't
work for building proper library packages.
You also want to read
After reading the second link you should realize that you need to build
the static library with other options than the normal .so (hint: -fPIC,
also check for -D_REENTRANT)
>> * Linda says:
>> $ linda ustr_1.0.1-1_i386.changes
>> W: libustr-1.0-1; The library libustr is not in a shlibs file.
>> W: libustr-debug-1.0-1; The library libustr-debug is not in a shlibs file.
>> E: libustr-debug-1.0-1; Binary /usr/lib/libustr-debug-1.0.so.1.0.1
>> contains unneeded section comment.
>> E: libustr-debug-1.0-1; Binary /usr/lib/libustr-debug-1.0.so.1.0.1 is
>> not stripped.
> I doubt about worthiness to have `-debug' packages now. Should I exclude
> libustr-debug-1.0-1 and libustr-debug-dev? If someone needs to debug
> ustr, he can build a debug library himself and so have the sources...
Chances are good that a -dbg package would make more sense then this
debug library weirdness.