On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:25:45PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Other than that issue, I think this would nicely address Debian's needs. > > > I'm pleased to see MySQL AB taking this step to clarify the license of > > > the client libraries. > > > It seems at that point that it would be easier to just put it under > > the LGPL. > > Except that the LGPL permits use of the code in ways that MySQL does not > want to allow. Well, what do they want to allow, and what don't they want to allow? Perhaps we can help them formalize the wording, if we understand their desires. -- G. Branden Robinson | The key to being a Southern Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you branden@debian.org | don't get caught. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Anthony Davidson
Attachment:
pgpAP3WBaTu_X.pgp
Description: PGP signature