Re: Request to review templates of OpenStack-related packages
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com> wrote:
> Matías Bellone wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> In the Spanish localization team we have identified some issues with
>> the templates of packages related to OpenStack. Thus we would like to
>> know your opinion about a general review of them as a whole.
>
> Most of the flaws you mention below sound familiar; are the templates
> you're looking at the versions from _before_ the recent (June-ish)
> debian-l10n-english review of the OpenStack templates?
All these comments are based on the updated files from August 16th:
- received at debian-l10n-spanish@l.d.o:
* nova [1]
* keystone [2]
* glance [3]
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-spanish/2013/08/msg00006.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-spanish/2013/08/msg00005.html
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-spanish/2013/08/msg00004.html
- received at debian-i18n@l.d.o for:
* ceilometer [4]
* cinder [5]
* heat [6]
* horizon [7]
[4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2013/08/msg00017.html
[5] https://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2013/08/msg00018.html
[6] https://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2013/08/msg00020.html
[7] https://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2013/08/msg00021.html
>> 2- only some templates have useful clarifications for translators
>>
>> In Keystone's templates there is a lengthy comment about what "tenant"
>> means that is not present in other templates but applies to them as
>> well
>
> Oh, yes, those strangely backwards "tenants", I remember that.
>
> We put the note in keystone since that's the package the tenants
> "belong to", but I suppose you're right, other templates should have a
> similar note.
>
I know it was mostly a cosmetic change. It just so happens that we had
a discussion about that term in the the debian-l10n-spanish list
because different people translated it differently on other templates
before I happened to check the keystone template where that comment
was.
Thanks a lot for the quick response,
Toote
Reply to: