[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 178 days and counting



Brad Felmey wrote:

> Simon, don't even pretend you understand what I was getting at. It's
> painfully obvious you don't.

Given that your posts consisted of:

>Since KDE 3.0 was released, and still nothing in sid.

and

>I'd rather just bitch about it, thanks.

... what is it that we are supposed to understand ? 

> If I wanted to maintain dozens of workstations using RPMFIND methods, I
> wouldn't be on Debian. It's people like you and the all-but-AWOL
> maintainer who are responsible for issues like this:
>
> http://debianplanet.org/node.php?id=813

I fail to see how I'm responsible for any of the issues raised in this 
article. I wont even attempt to speak on Chris's behalf but I will say that I 
am more than happy with the job Chris has done, since he took over as kde 
maintainer. Perhaps that's because I'm judging him by the quality of his 
packages and not by how vocal he is on this list. What makes you think he is 
"all-but-AWOL" ? 
 
> And between bouts of insinuating that I'm too st00p1d to figure out how
> to install unofficial debs (breaking everything compiled against
> libarts), see if you can figure out how to set your line-wrap
> appropriately in KMail.

The only thing I insinuated was that it's not a big effort to add a couple of 
lines to your sources.list. You seem to be suggesting that you intend to 
employ debian/unstable on dozens of workstations, presumably a production 
environment: I'd say that editing a simple config file will be the least of 
your problems and I would have thought you would be grateful that so much 
hard work was going into minimising the effects of the transition to gcc3.2. 
Or would you prefer it if your dozens of workstations were a bit more 
unstable ? 

As for the line wrap it's set to 78, always has been. Looks like a bug in 
kmail when moving mails to or from the drafts folder. I'll try and reproduce 
it. Anyone else seen anything similar ? Nothing on the kde bug page.

-- 
Simon Hepburn.




Reply to: