Re: konqeror bugs of note *stable*
Agreed, WWWOFFLE a very flexible and powerful tool, with many uses.
I don't know how to have separate configs, but I've just added the main HTTPS
sites that I use in the "No Proxy" line in the Konq configuration of Proxies.
This works and is an acceptable solution for now.
On Saturday 07 April 2001 6:10 pm, Jens Benecke wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 06:24:32PM +0100, David Morgan wrote:
> > Assuming you have got the OpenSSL package installed then I bet the
> > problem is that you are running WWWOFFLE as a cacheing proxy. T..
> >
> > .. tests show that Konq is OK with SSL, Netscape and WWWOFFLE are OK with
> > SSL, but Konq and WWWOFFLE doesn't work on SSL sites. I've tried
> > different permutations of SSL level but the result seems the sam..
> >
> > ..sue doesn't seem to have caught peoples attention. Perhaps it is just
> > newcomers who run WWWOFFLE? It is part of the Debian Potato standard
> > installation set.
>
> No, many laptop users do as well. WWWOFFLE is _perfect_ for a laptop
> environment. You can subscribe to web sites and visit them (or have your
> whole network visit them) when you're offline. You can configure WWWOFFLE
> to download the stuff regularly (I've done this with slashdot, misc.
> documentation sites (php.net, zope docs, etc.). Plus, you can browse your
> whole cache when offline.
>
> WWWOFFLE is a little bit strange when under load, i.e. it doesn't really
> replace Squid (and it doesn't want to either)
>
>
> Having said that, I'm having the same problems. I vote for giving Konqueror
> seperate configs for HTTPS and HTTP. Or don't proxy HTTPS at all if that
> doesn't work.
----------------------------------------
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="iso-8859-1";
name="Attachment: 1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description:
----------------------------------------
Reply to: