On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 21:28, Rob Taylor wrote: > first off,a question. Why, if i install gnome-cups-manager, it is placed > in preferences://System-Tools, rather than system-settings://? Does anyone actually use system-settings://? I've only ever seen it populated on Red Hat. Really gnome-system-tools and gnome-cups-manager need to agree on a location to appear in the menus. Desktop Prefs->System is not great, as it's not a desktop preference, but stock GNOME doesn't have a System Settings menu entry. Maybe we should patch the vFolder a la Red Hat and add System Settings after Desktop Preferences? > Secondly, here's an overview of functionally I'd like to see (and will do > the work myself, this is a high-priority task for me ;) > > 1) Addition of odd/even/reverse printing options to the default > gnome-print dialog If you are going to use CUPS, then you could apply the Ximian Desktop 2 patches to libgnomeprint, which make the print dialogs a fair bit nicer (but assume that CUPS is being used). IIRC, this is one of the extra options. > 2) Addition of ability to install ppd from a driver disk in > gnome-cups-manager You'd need to aquire root access for this somehow -- as far as I know gnome-cups-manager can run as a normal user as it talks to CUPS to do the work, which can become root. > 3) Panel application for printer status and queue management As Sebastien pointed out, gnome-cups-manager comes with this. > GGV: no printer dialog calls lpr directly. This is becasue it just dumps > the PS stright there. Bug in bugzuillaa suggests maintainer thisnks is v. > dificult to use gnoem print. Deserves investigation into what GPDF does. (This is as I understood it, and may be wrong) GPDF uses gnome-print internally, what you see on screen is gnome-print writing to an in-memory image. > GIMP: doesn't use gnome-print dialogs and does some printer management. > Why? What's going on here? GIMP doesn't use any GNOME libraries, it only relies upon GTK+. > My primary concern is that all this should work well in Debian, so I'd > rather produce diffs at debian level then propagate them upwards. My main > question, is should i do this work against 2.4, backporting changes when > necessary, or Is there an aim to have working 2.6 packages soon? I'd recommend contacting upstream about this -- gnome-cups-manager upstream is Jody Goldberg now, who works for Ximian. He and Dave Camp will be able to tell you what their heavily-patched gnomeprint does, and maybe it would be less work to work on integrating parts of their code into the official releases. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com jabber: ross@burtonini.com www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part