Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:43:28 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201307201443.37410.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1V0W5w-0004xv-PA@swivel.zugschlus.de>
References: <[🔎] 51E3B049.4020103@debian.org> <[🔎] 1374312478.4511.2.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] E1V0W5w-0004xv-PA@swivel.zugschlus.de>

On Samstag, 20. Juli 2013, Marc Haber wrote:
> Why?

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00725.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
  - From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
Next by Date: Re: Berkeley DB 6.0 license change to AGPLv3
Previous by thread: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
Next by thread: Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread