On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:06:34PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Chris Knadle <Chris.Knadle@coredump.us> wrote: > > > After all, it isn't called gzless. > > > > Actually, that's not far off. Right now these functions are spread > > across 4 different binaries, each of which is in a different package. > > Probably the best thing to do would be to just incorporate the functionality > in the less package. You mean like lesspipe(1)? Seems like it might need to be updated to handle *.xz, but other than that looks like it fits the bill. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature