Re: State of developers-reference
On 09/09/09 at 16:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:04:16PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Choosing CC BY-SA would nicely conflict with our existing documentation,
> > like the Debian new maintainer guide (GPL2+) or developers-reference
> > (GPL2+). Wouldn't it be possible to use CC BY-SA with an additional
> > clause allowing to switch to GPL2+?
> >
> > The french CeCILL license has such a clause (see 5.3.4 in
> > http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_CeCILL_V2-en.txt).
>
> Why are we discussing this, given that from early feedback it was more
> or less clear that we do not want to go the wiki way for devref?
That would apply to moving content from the wiki to dev-ref. If the wiki
is CC BY-SA, and dev-ref is GPL2+, we have a problem.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: