[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: State of developers-reference



On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:04:16PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Choosing CC BY-SA would nicely conflict with our existing documentation,
> like the Debian new maintainer guide (GPL2+) or developers-reference
> (GPL2+). Wouldn't it be possible to use CC BY-SA with an additional
> clause allowing to switch to GPL2+?
> 
> The french CeCILL license has such a clause (see 5.3.4 in
> http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_CeCILL_V2-en.txt).

Why are we discussing this, given that from early feedback it was more
or less clear that we do not want to go the wiki way for devref?

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: