On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 08:34:02AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > Anyone can suggest things, and that's fine. The difference between > > a suggestion and a demand is in how you behave if your request isn't > > accepted. > I have seen no demand here. ] This is really an unacceptable situation. ] ] I'm asking you, the DPL, to do something about it. If the current delegates ] cannot or will not do what they need to do, *you* need to replace them. If you think that's just a bit of friendly advice, I'd hate to see what you think a demand is. > I don't think that James or Ryan have any greater monopoly on what's > right than any of the rest of us hundreds of developers, or the rest of > the thousands or Debian users. *shrug* Then you're entirely wrong. Maintainers have near absolute authority over what they maintain, everyone else has almost no say. I'm not sure how you could have been a developer so long without noticing this. If you really think that non-maintainers who've got no access to the machines have a better idea of what's going on than the primary maintainers and developers, you're crazy. Neither of those are a monopoly, and neither are a guarantee of being right; but that's the way to bet. > I haven't seen any demands, nor have I seen any evidence that the people > making "decisions" on the matter actually have. Really? I'm just going via the subject line, which indicates there has been a decision made. "No." is a decision, as is "Further discussion isn't warranted.", if you hadn't noticed. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature