[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#190038: libgtkdatabox_1:0.2.3.0-1(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on m68k



Hello,

I tried to investigate the problem a little bit deeper.  The problem seems
to be hidden in the configure script and I have no idea how to fix that.
This is from a build which I tried at crest.debian.org in an unstable chroot

> ....
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0... no
> *** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
> *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the
> *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ was incorrectly installed
> *** or that you have moved GTK+ since it was installed. In the latter case, you
> *** may want to edit the pkg-config script: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> configure: creating ./config.status

I just stopped here because this should not happen.  File config.log says:

> ....
>
> configure:7454: result: /usr/bin/pkg-config
> configure:7474: checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0
> configure:7586: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -
> I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gli
> b-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include     conftest.c -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-
> x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2
> ..0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0    >&5
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `Xine
> ramaIsActive'
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `Xine
> ramaQueryScreens'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> configure:7589: $? = 1
> configure: program exited with status 1
> configure: failed program was:
> #line 7510 "configure"
> ....
I have really no idea what to do and I hope somebody could help me out here.

Kind regards

        Andreas.

-- 
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
		-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum








Reply to: