Re: 88 Priority violations in woody
Previously Thomas Hood wrote:
> These are all policy violations.
> Since these are all policy violations, they are all "serious" bugs.
> Since they are all "serious" bugs, they are all RC bugs.
And you are never supposed to mass-file bugreports unless there is
a clear consensus amongst developers. In this case the only thing that
was accomplished is annoying a large number of developers with
bugreports that are policy violations but which are not severe enough to
hold up the release. I just excluded all your bugreports which the BTS
has processed so far from the release critical bug lists in order to
maintain sanity.
As the woody release comes closer you can expect a different between
bugs with a severity of serious or higher and bugs that really are
severe enough to be deemed release critical. In this case those bugs
are a policy violation, but they are not something a user will ever
notice which does not make them release critical.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: