2008/1/8, Ian Lewis <ianmlewis@gmail.com>: > Point taken. Japanese courts seem to be a bit more concerned with intent > rather than the strength of the wording of a written agreement. If > non-commercial use being prohibited without permission is non-free then this > work should be interpreted as non-free. Yup, I'll consider it non-free then. Thanks everybody in the thread, you've been of great help!! :) Miry