On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:51:42PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:18:52 +1000, Anthony Towns > <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:31:35AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > >> How feasible is this for Debian to do without FHS backup? If not, then > >> we should draft a proposal to the FHS folk pushing /run. > >It's required for us to do it without FHS backup: the current FHS > >maintainer's policy [0] is to accept changes only when they've been > >demonstrated as being workable by distros. > So we are practically forced to be FHS incompatible for the time > being, and if the maintainer doesn't take our proposal, we either > change back or stay FHS incompatible? We're incompatible right now, because we're putting stuff in /etc that the FHS says belongs in /var. Implementing something better in Debian seems to be the only way forward. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgp765DpUcYnR.pgp
Description: PGP signature