On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:51:02AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > In particular, it is _not_ a problem if a program ends up linking > > against two different libstdc++ libraries, right? It's inefficient, > > but otherwise irrelevant. I just want to make sure before I remove the > > otherwise misleading "c102" bit from the libglu1c102 package. > > I believe that this is correct. There may be corner case problems with > exception handling, but it won't break the way other things do; and > since libGLU could be implemented in C I doubt people rely on exception > handling working through it. I believe the two won't interfere. Please let me know if I need to be doing anything differently with the xlibmesa* packages. -- G. Branden Robinson | What influenced me to atheism was Debian GNU/Linux | reading the Bible cover to cover. branden@debian.org | Twice. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- J. Michael Straczynski
Attachment:
pgpbulUyHyrIE.pgp
Description: PGP signature