Re: libgl1 vs C++ transition, round 2

[Jamie Wilkinson <jaq@debian.org>]

This one time, at band camp, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>    * Some implementations of libGLU.so.1 are written in C, and others
>      are written in C++; the ones in sid are all written in C++.  The
>      calling conventions are all C.  The C++ implementations don't
>      export functions with C++ calling conventions.  The current
>      versions written in C++ link against:
>
>            libstdc++.so.5
>            libm.so.6
>            libc.so.6
>            libgcc_s.so.1

> I just want to make sure before I remove the
> otherwise misleading "c102" bit from the libglu1c102 package.

If I understand this correctly, you want to make sure that libGLU.so does
not export C++ symbols in its ABI?

That's great!

-- 
jaq@debian.org                               http://people.debian.org/~jaq