Re: Bug#75853: TONER CARTRIDGES
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:02:07PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com>:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 02:55:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > > No one is proposing every bug report to go through this process. You
> > > > are DD. System can be made to accept all DD mails. (I know spoofing
> > > > may become problem.) It looks to me that most good bug reports are from
> > > > DD.
> > >
> > > If it were true that only debian developers made good bug reports, then
> > > we'd not need to bother with all these users and public ftp sites and
> > > stuff. :-P
> >
> > Of course. (I do not think I meant such as thing.)
> >
> > All I wanted to say was bug reports from DD tend to be good quality :)
> >
> > It looks like everyone agrees that setting up some abuse prevention
> > mechanism is needed for the Debian BTS. I am happy with that.
>
> Oki then. We agree no this.
(I do not understand this line? Typo of my name?)
> If it isn't ok/desirable with a 'verification mail', how about _REQUIRING_
> that the initial bug report (not it's followups) is formated according
> to standards (the way 'bug' and 'reportbug' - is there such a command?)
> formates the bugreport.
(BTW, I am OK for sending a verification mail to the new person who is
not non-original posters and/or non-subscribers of the debian mailing
list... I just do not insist on it since some people objected strongly.)
Problem seems to be a SPAM mail sent to the particular bug
number when they picked up address from mailing list....
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ also http://qref.sf.net
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: