Re: Bug#75853: TONER CARTRIDGES
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:02:07PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> If it isn't ok/desirable with a 'verification mail', how about _REQUIRING_
> that the initial bug report (not it's followups) is formated according
> to standards (the way 'bug' and 'reportbug' - is there such a command?)
> formates the bugreport.
This is already required. A message with no Package: tag at all (as
opposed to a wrong package) is rejected with a message like this:
Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all.
This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report and tell us which package
the report is on. For help, check out http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.html.
Your message was dated <date> and had
message-id <message-id>
and subject <subject>.
The complete text of it is attached to this message.
If you need any assistance or explanation please contact me.
bug and reportbug always include the Package: tag.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: