Re: about the debian way
On 16-Mar-02, 13:47 (CST), christophe barb? <christophe.barbe.ml@online.fr> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:35:11AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> What I don't really appreciate is when a bug is closed without reason to
> do it.
[...]
> And btw I think that the 'cut and past' solution (which is the reason
> behind the bug closing)
So there was a reason...
> is a bad one. It will break as soon as
> checksecurity change in the cron package script and before this happen I
> will loose the benefit of bug fixes and new features if I don't check
> the diff between my modified conffile and the new one for each upgrade.
Just like all your other modified conffiles. FWIW those four lines
haven't changed since *at least* 4/99 (when I put them under CVS.)
> Steve if you want to make me happy (why not?):
> . reopen the bug and tag it wontfix
Whatever...
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
Reply to: