[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#138541: ITP: debian-sanitize (was Re: inappropriate racist and other offensive material)



>>"Nick" == Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com> writes:

 Nick> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 04:52:19PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
 >> > I object to using any subjective method (such as popular vote)
 >> > for determining which packages should be conflicted with in such
 >> > a package.

 Nick> OK, so how about we define constituencies such as "religious
 Nick> fundamentalist" of one kind or another, "Moral Majority",
 Nick> "vi-weenie", "GUI luser" etc., and people who number themselves
 Nick> in each group get to vote for a configuration which would suit
 Nick> that particular group.


	This has actually more merit than appears at first glance. At
 least this acknowledges that there are differing views, and caters to
 different constituencies. It also offers users greater choice, and
 finer granularity of biases.

	manoj
-- 
 A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from
 you. Ramsey Clark
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: