Re: looking for replacement for run (because of critical bug in
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 00-12-25 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It would be nice if less included a feature to close and reopen the current
> > file. Then this would not be necessary.
>
> Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
> -F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
> logfile will be rotated, it will notice this and reopen the new current
> one and tail this one. This is a feature that I really miss in GNU tail.
It sounds pretty easy to implement; just stat() and compare the inode number.
Is this how the FreeBSD tail does it? Why not write a patch for GNU tail?
--
- mdz
Reply to: