Re: testing "testing" (was: Implementing "testing")
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:11:21PM -0500, David Z Maze wrote:
> A marginally better approach would probably be what wound up happening
> with lintian. Note that we do have a package to check for common
> errors in packages, but there's no automated process that files bugs
> based on its results. Instead, developers are encouraged to run
> lintian before uploading their packages; support is in debhelper to do
> this, and dh_make causes it to be done by default. Lintian-clean is
> good, but not required and not automagically checked for.
Where does debhelper or dh_make call lintian? I can't find any reference to
lintian in either of them.
--
- mdz
Reply to: