Re: Craig Sanders
Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> writes:
> From my observation Craig's email is direct and to the point. He doesn't
> mess around and he doesn't mind telling people what he thinks of them. His
> opinions are strong, but I think that they are generally accurate.
Does that mean that you believe I am a wanker? That I have nothing of
value to contribute to Debian? Do you think I'm an asshole? Do you
think I am making Debian an unpleasant place? Do you think what I
write is fuckwitted bullshit?
Do you really want to stand behind Craig's language?
> PS I don't have any great recollection of seeing email from you on this
> list. Do you post to any threads other than the flame threads? I generally
> delete any thread on this list that has more than 30 messages in a day
> because it's mostly trash.
Yes, I do. But a disagreement is not necessary a flame: it's a
disagreement. A flame is when people resort to name-calling, to
violent insults, and the like.
> PPS In these flame wars I often just presume that Craig is right without
> reading the messages in detail, he usually is.
Really? You think that when he insults people's intelligence,
commitment, integrity, or honesty, he's usually right?
Thomas
Reply to: