Re: qmail

To: Debian-Devel List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: qmail
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:06:29 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000821210629.A26962@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000821132840.A5509@olemiss.edu>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0008211336020.7513-100000@mail.linuxsolutions.net.au> <[🔎] 20000821022204.A10121@dmgware.ca> <[🔎] 20000821132840.A5509@olemiss.edu>

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 01:28:40PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > Debian officially recommends something?  That's news to me.
> 
> I believe we ship exim as the "standard" MTA (we changed from smail in
> hamm or slink); I don't know if that makes it recommended or not.

It makes it recommended for new users, that's all, IIRC.

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply to:

References:
- qmail
  - From: Niall Young <niall@holbytla.org>
- Re: qmail
  - From: Dan Brosemer <odin@linuxfreak.com>
- Re: qmail
  - From: Chris Lawrence <cnlawren@olemiss.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: FW: Firewall Project
Next by Date: List 'linux-il' closed to public posts
Previous by thread: Re: qmail
Next by thread: Re: qmail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread