On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 13:54, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:02:58AM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > > Perhaps it's high time dpkg received some serious optimization. The way > > apt-get is also really slow on slow hardware, and it already has binary > cache files I think. So I've noticed. For some reason, its dependency tree is not cached, even though everything else is. When I last ran it on an old machine of mine, building the dependency tree took a long time. I'm not surprised, as that's pretty complex, but why can't it be cached? Alex. -- PGP Public Key: http://aoi.dyndns.org/~alex/pgp-public-key -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s:++ a18 C++(++++)>$ UL+++(++++) P--- L+++>++++ E---- W+(+++) N- o-- K+ w--- !O M(+) V-- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP+(+++) t* 5-- X-- R tv b- DI D+++ G e h! !r y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part