[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#571958: could someone in the d-i team could at least acknowledge the existance of this bug?



reassign 571958 iso-scan
retitle 571958 Shouldn't try to locate ISO images on unsupported file systems
thanks

Quoting Costin (costinel@gmail.com):
> I can't believe this bug has gone one whole year unnoticed and
> unfixed... and still counting.

Welcome to free software development where nobody is paid for doing
the work, where you can't blame anybody for not caring about your pet
feature..;and where, sometimes, you're best served by yourself...

This bug was left sleeping among the gazillion other bug reports
reported vaguely against debian-installer. Apparently, at the time it
was reported, nobody in the team cared enough to have a look at it, or
comment. Then, believe it or not, nobody is regularly coming back on
all reported bugs  to check if some have been "forgotten". So, thanks
for volunteering doing this, it will be deeply appreciated by the team.

Back to the bug, I believe it could belong to the iso-scan
component....but I am very balanced about it: I'm not sure we should
load ntfs of xfs modules at that moment of the installation just to
support what is after all a corner case (installing from an
NTFS-formatted USB device). Adding an extra module adds more memory
constraints, increases the size of D-I initrd....which is something we
are very conservative about.

So, from such interpretation, I believe that iso-scan code should just
be fixed to *not attempt to locate ISO images on unsupported (at that
moment of the install) file systems..

Alternatively, what Ferenc mentioned is true. If, prior to the
iso-scan execution, the ntfs modules are loaded (which is possible
during expert installs), then what you want is probably possible.

So, after all, this might be considered a non-bug. What you want is
possible, but you have to use an expert install (but we're in a corner
case, remember..:-)).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: