Hello Robert (CC'ed to get attention...of course no need to CC me back in answers), I'd like to comment on the reinstated partman-zfs template: _Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem? You have configured one or more partitions with the ZFS file system. Although ZFS is supported on i386, using it without special tuning may lead to performance or stability problems due to limitations of the Intel 386 architecture. . You're encouraged to either use the AMD64 version of this installer (if your hardware supports this), or go back to the partitioning menu and configure your partitions to use another filesystem. I corrected the last "filesystem" to "file system" but, more generally, I'm wondering about the general idea. If I understand well, partman-zfs is unstable on kfreebsd-i386 but fine on kfreebsd-amd64. However, would it be a problem to talk about "32 bits systems" and "64 bits systems" instead of "i386" and "amd64"? These arches names are confusing enough, imho. Something like: _Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem? You have configured one or more partitions with the ZFS file system. Although ZFS is supported on 32 bits systems, using it without special tuning may lead to performance or stability problems. . You're encouraged to either use the 64 bits version of this installer, referred as "amd64 architecture" (if your hardware supports this), or go back to the partitioning menu and configure the partitions to use another file system. (also dropping one occurrence or "*your* partitions"....as partitions are not "mine") --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature