[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg modification: non-interactivity



Previously Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> dpkg should assume "no" (this has to be implemented somehow). The
> configfiles are generated (or copied from a central repository
> anyways).
> 
> At the university, I use the following scheme to keep a bunch of
> Windows 3.1 boxes updated:
[.. snip snip..]

There are many ways to do this. I once perl wrappers around rdist once
to keep a couple of labrooms up-to-date, with some autogenerated stuff.

> So for debian, this would mean: after installation, it would call a
> script update-config, which will fetch the config files for this
> specific box.

`it' being something the administrator himself (herself? do female UNIX
admins exist?) makes.

Adding a --never-replace-configfile option for dpkg should do the trick.

Wichert.

-- 
==============================================================================
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Attachment: pgp1BfZObFDuT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: