Re: kernel-image-2.6.7
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Yes, as I reported, I could boot your kernel with the good old ramdisk, so
> initrd should work.
And my own 2.6.8.1 with CONFIG_MODULES=y still doesn't get very far and
prints very suspicious errors...
| Linux version 2.6.8.1 (geert@anakin) (gcc version 2.95.2 20000220 (Debian GNU/Linux)) #15 Sun Aug 15 10:01:13 CEST 2004
| Amiga hardware found: [A4000] VIDEO BLITTER AUDIO FLOPPY A4000_IDE KEYBOARD MOUSE SERIAL PARALLEL A3000_CLK CHIP_RAM PAULA LISA ALICE_PAL ZORRO3
| Warning: kernel runs in Zorro II memory
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ain't have no Zorro II memory...
Easily explained by System.map:
| 00194090 B amiga_model
| 00194090 B m68k_memory
| 00194094 B amiga_chipset
So initializing amiga_model kills m68k_memory...
| *** ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION *** FORMAT=0
| Current process id is -833555952
| BAD KERNEL TRAP: 00000000
| Modules linked in:
| PC: [<0019efc6>] free_bootmem_core+0x22/0x70
|
| SR: 2704 SP: 001b1f58 a2: 0014b506
| d0: 00000000 d1: 00000000 d2: 00000000 d3: 0000000c
| d4: 00000000 d5: 00190e90 a0: 0000000b a1: 001928c4
| Process J( (pid: -833555952, stackpage=00011008)
| Stack from 001b1f58:
| 00000000 00000000 0000000c 00000000 00190e90 0000000b 001928c4 0014b506
| 00000000 ffffffff 00000000 27040019 efc60010 00000000 00000000 0019f5d8
| 001928c4 0000000b 00000000 0019d3a8 0000000b 00000000 001af000 0000010a
| 00001538 000119a8 00088000 0000ffff 000270fa 07401000 07401000 001b1ff8
| 00000000 07401000 0019ac92 001b1ff4 00125076 001af000 075f1520 00190efc
| 00000000 0019a2fc
| Call Trace:
| Kernel panic: ÿÿ?Ð<0>Kernel panic: ÿÿ?Ð<0>Kern
| In interrupt handler - not syncing
| <0>Rebooting in 544630130 seconds..<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Without module support, everything is fine...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: