[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036751: RFS: mini-httpd/1.30-4 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server



Hello again,
Uploaded again to mentors.
Turns out bullseye-backports lintian (2.115.1~bpo11+1) only checks for 4.6.1 Standards, therefore a more serious error (depends-on-obsolete-package lsb-base) was reported by sid lintian.
Upon inspecting the situation (lsb-base is now a transitional empty package only here for debootstrap purposes mainly) and reading https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/01/msg00160.html I removed the package dependency entirely. This should be entirely safe. I also added Upstream-Contact into debian/copyright and stripped some trailing whitelines. Package should be lintian O.K. now.
Nicholas, my salsa account is verified now, waiting for push permission if that is ok. Is there anything else I should do now about that ?

Best,
Alexandru

------- Original Message -------
On Saturday, June 3rd, 2023 at 12:59 PM, Alexandru Mihail <alexandru_mihail@protonmail.ch> wrote:


> Hi,
> Thanks everyone for the input !
> Indeed the forking service type is the correct one for this package as daemon() is called as part of the initialization sequence. (if daemon() is not available, plain fork() is called anyway)
> I've adjusted debian/rules, taking into consideration Lorenzo's advice, thanks Lorenzo !
> 
> > Thanks! Do you know if you'd prefer to fork and file pull
> > requests/merge requests, or wait for the permissions to push directly to
> > be granted?
> 
> I'd prefer waiting for push permission, for sure; if that is not possible in the near future, I can also fork and file requests.
> 
> Have a great weekend!
> Alexandru
> 
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Saturday, June 3rd, 2023 at 1:58 AM, Nicholas D Steeves nsteeves@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Alexandru Mihail alexandru_mihail@protonmail.ch writes:
> > 
> > > As for the old bugs, at least #491078 and #1018900 are stil present, I
> > > shall test a user submitted patch for the first one.
> > 
> > Thank you for taking the time to verify and document this. While not
> > required, it would also be nice if #491078 was noted in the appropriate
> > patch[es]. Bug-Debian is an optional field:
> > https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/
> > 
> > > I'll also create a salsa account soon.
> > 
> > Thanks! Do you know if you'd prefer to fork and file pull
> > requests/merge requests, or wait for the permissions to push directly to
> > be granted?
> > 
> > > I hope this mail finds you well !
> > 
> > Thanks, you as well!
> > Nicholas


Reply to: