Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 23:20:47 +0100 with message-id <CAMw=ZnRVbtRN-3rLnWH=_kQu6ZUS1ECVXkCsnoYtbFatDbUFsA@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple library-based package manager has caused the Debian Bug report #1006020, regarding RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple library-based package manager to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1006020: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006020 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple library-based package manager
- From: Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 00:13:37 -0500
- Message-id: <5fc5016a-3300-b30a-835c-a87001f1ae24@gmail.com>
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pacman-package-manager": * Package name : pacman-package-manager Version : 6.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Pacman Development Team <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> * URL : https://archlinux.org/pacman/ * License : GPL-2+, MIT, curl, unlicense, public-domain * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/benthetechguy/pacman Section : admin It builds those binary packages: pacman-package-manager - Simple library-based package manager libalpm13 - Arch Linux Package Management library makepkg - Arch Linux package build utilityTo access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:https://mentors.debian.net/package/pacman-package-manager/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacman-package-manager/pacman-package-manager_6.0.1-1.dscChanges for the initial release: pacman-package-manager (6.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial Package (Closes: #511994) Regards, -- Ben WestoverAttachment: OpenPGP_0xC311C5F54E89B698.asc
Description: OpenPGP public keyAttachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com>
- Cc: 1006020-done@bugs.debian.org, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@michel-slm.name>
- Subject: Re: RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple library-based package manager
- From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 23:20:47 +0100
- Message-id: <CAMw=ZnRVbtRN-3rLnWH=_kQu6ZUS1ECVXkCsnoYtbFatDbUFsA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 85e685c7-4549-dee1-65ee-45521b2f5c21@gmail.com>
- References: <5fc5016a-3300-b30a-835c-a87001f1ae24@gmail.com> <[🔎] 8715c4bc6ece5379e99e8bea6435e04de54bbaa8.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] e85a1b4d-15eb-8c81-009a-f11caa4bfae7@gmail.com> <[🔎] 03dea92e0ad5428eae76e4655e2166d714bfb9e3.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 85e685c7-4549-dee1-65ee-45521b2f5c21@gmail.com>
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 22:44, Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > On 7/29/22 5:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Still a couple of Lintian warnings to fix, then you can finalize the > > changelog and I'll upload: > > > > I: pacman-package-manager source: duplicate-long-description libalpm-dev libalpm13 [debian/control] > > I: libalpm-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short > > Fixed > > > I: libalpm13: extended-description-is-probably-too-short > > There's not really much more information to say on libalpm; I don't know > what else to put in the description without making it a word salad. > > > I: libalpm13: package-contains-empty-directory [usr/share/libalpm/hooks/] > > I: makepkg: package-contains-empty-directory [usr/share/makepkg-template/] > > Fixed > > > This one doesn't need to be fixed in the package, just send a patch > > upstream and it can be picked up in the next version: > > > > I: pacman-package-manager: typo-in-manual-page "allows to" "allows one to" [usr/share/man/man8/pacman.8.gz:264] > > Sent the patch upstream. > > I didn't even know about these Lintian tags since lintian by default > only shows warnings and above (these are info tags). I've updated my > machine's Lintian config to show me everything, even down to pedantic. > My (minor) changes have been pushed to Salsa and Mentors. Looks good, uploaded.
--- End Message ---