On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 05:57:26AM +0000, Håvard F. Aasen wrote: > On 2022-06-10 15:52, Bastian Germann wrote: > > Am 10.06.22 um 17:35 schrieb Håvard F. Aasen: > > > > I have forked the salsa repo to debian namespace and invited you. > > > I know the package is already uploaded, but is this a hard > > > requirement for you? I would prefer to have it under my own > > > namespace. > > > > Kind of. If (when) you become unresponsive and someone else is taking > > over the package, we can keep that. > Not sure if I agree with you on this one, you proved yourself how easy > it is to move the repository, this will be just as easy if I become > unresponsive at a later time. > Most of my worries is because of [1]. By placing it in the Debian > namespace it is now in the "Debian Team" where every DD can do > whatever they want. That "whatever" indeed include smart, good, needed, desired and even stupid things. > > I would really like to keep it that way. Please tag the uploaded > > version when it has arrived in the archive. > Will do. > > I will keep the repo in the Debian namespace for now and not push > this further, but personally I feel that demanding packages to be > part of a team isn't the best approach. Aiming for perfect is good, reaching good is much better. Groeten Geert Stappers DD P.S. In an ideal world will happen a stupid thing only once. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Collaborative_Maintenance:_.22Debian.22_group -- Silence is hard to parse
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature