Hi Andreas Henriksson, On 10/01/2017 15:36, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello Kyle Robbertze, > > [...] > In my personal opinion it's your choice to "upgrade" to the later version > but in my experience the ftp-masters expect you to document the original > licensing offer made by upstream in debian/copyright. > (So if you actually intend to upgrade the version of the license > you likely atleast need to state this explicitly so it's obvious > when it gets reviewed. I assume it's a simple mistake on your side > though and you intended to use the same license as upstream.) I licensed it under the GPLv3+, because, while src/extension.js is licensed under the GPLv2+, the rest according to the LICENSE file is under the GPLv3+. Should I rather add the src/extension.js exception? Thanks Kyle
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature