Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

[Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>]

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:13:22PM +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> src:setcolortemperature
> binary: sct
> 
> please choose one, and use the same, you can't usually expect users to install
> a package and expect a binary called in another way.
> 
> I seem to be pedantic, but I really like to have them called in the same way

Aren't there different rationales for source and binary package names?
This is what I have been thinking:

- source package name should be upstream's name, because it's the
  *source*
- binary package name is whatever makes most sense for someone typing
  apt-get

-- 
Sean Whitton